The Visits of Sir Charles Alfred Bell and the Treaty of Punakha, 1910
Before his retirement in 1908, Claude had advised
British India to have a closer relationship with Bhutan. He had also urged the
Government to increase the annual subsidy and assist in developments to thwart possible
Chinese interventions in Bhutan. Claude even proposed to draw a new treaty with
Bhutan. The provision of the treaty of Sinchula (1865) only allows the British
interference in Bhutan’s dispute with Sikkim and Cooch Bihar, not with any
other states. After Charles Bell succeeded Claude as a political officer in
April 1908, he was tasked with advising the government on foreign affairs.
Fearing the growing influence of the Chinese, Bell proposed a new treaty with
Bhutan and urged British India to increase the annual subsidy. Towards the end
of 1909, Bell’s proposal came through and a draft treaty was approved. Bell was
permitted to increase the annual subsidy if Bhutan agrees to the terms.
Charles Bell set off from Gangtok in January 1910 with
captain Robert Kennedy (a medical officer). Bell had a
preliminary meeting with Kazi Ugyen Dorji at Darjeeling and he had already
taken the draft treaty in both Tibetan and English to His Majesty. After weeks
of journey, Bell reached Punakha and was received by His Majesty the king and
the council to the camp. At first, Bell observed the council members were
reluctant and found it difficult to gain consent. After assuring the
non-interference in internal affairs by the British government, Bell gained the
council’s consent. The
four copies of the treaty, two copies each in English and Bhutanese were
produced. On 8 January 1910, the corresponding 27th day of the 11th
month of the Earth-Bird (Sa-ja) year after having agreed to the terms from both parties, a
new treaty was signed at the marquee in the compound of Bell’s camp, Punakha.
The treaty of Punakha saw the revision of Article IV and Article
VIII of the Treaty of Sinchula which was signed in1865.
·
Article IV was revised as: "The
British Government has increased the annual subsidy to the Government of Bhutan
from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 with effect from the 10th January 1910."
·
Article VIII was revised as: “The
British Government undertakes to exercise no interference in the internal administration
of Bhutan. On its part, the Bhutanese Government agrees to be guided by the
advice of the British Government regarding external relations. In the event of
disputes with or causes of complaint against the Maharajas of Sikkim and Cooch Behar,
such matters will be referred for arbitration to the British Government which
will settle them in such manner as justice may require and insist upon the
observance of its decisions by the Maharajas named."
Charles
wrote that the signing and sealing of the treaty were completed at one o’clock
in the afternoon. The treaty was first signed with a large square Zhabdrung’s
seal. Then, the seal of His Majesty was affixed. The treaty also has the councils’
members’ seals, including the seal of Zhung Dronyer, Paro Penlop, Dagana
Penlop, Thimphu Dzongpoen, Wangdiphodrang Dzongpon, Punakha Dzongpoen, and Deb
Zimpon. Upon Bell’s insistence, the seal of the monk’s body representative was
also affixed.
During the signing of the Treaty of Punakha on 8 January 1910
After
the treaty, Bell wrote, “It is well that we have this treaty; good for us and
good for Bhutan, whose economic interests, as time goes on, will be seen more
and more in the direction of India.” During their several weeks in Bhutan, Bell could cement the friendship
with His Majesty like his predecessor Claude. Bell wrote, “His Highness is not
only a very able ruler but is also universally respected both by his subjects
and his foreign friends. Though he has only twice in his life quitted his
hermit land, he has all the broadminded tolerance of one who has lived a
composition life.”
On his departure from Bhutan, His Majesty presented
Bell with one of the five gold medals that had been struck to commemorate the
ascension to the throne in 1907. Like his predecessors, Charles described the
immense hospitality received in Bhutan. On his journey back, Charles observed
that the reconstruction of Paro Dzong has been almost completed. The Paro Dzong
was lost to fire in 1907 and it was recorded in the journal of John Claude
White.
Although the information in Bell’s diary does not have
any significant impacts, his visit to Bhutan and signing of the treaty led to
the revision of subsidy which has been long overdue. Significantly, the treaty
also secured protection from the British government against external threats.
There is no official record of Charles Bell’s visit to Bhutan after his first
visit.
Bibliography
Bell, C. A. (1992). Tibet past and present. New
Delhi: Asian Educational Services
Collister, P. (1987). Bhutan and the British.
London: Serindia Publications.
Sigh, N. (1972).
Bhutan: A kingdom in the Himalayas. New
Delhi: Thompson Press Limited.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home